Section 101B – Appeal to National Appellate Authority

Section 101B of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with appeals to the National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. It is an important provision in the GST advance ruling framework because it provides a mechanism for dealing with conflicting advance rulings issued by the Appellate Authorities for Advance Ruling of two or more States or Union territories.

The provision is closely connected with Sections 97, 100, 101, 101A and 101C of the CGST Act. Section 97 identifies the questions on which an advance ruling may be sought, Sections 100 and 101 deal with appeals before the State-level Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Section 101A establishes the National Appellate Authority framework, Section 101B provides the appeal mechanism, and Section 101C deals with the order of the National Appellate Authority. The GST Council originally proposed these provisions to address situations where different State-level appellate authorities gave conflicting rulings on the same issue.

What Is Section 101B of the CGST Act?

Section 101B provides that where conflicting advance rulings are given by the Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories, or both, on questions referred to in Section 97(2), an eligible applicant or an authorised officer may prefer an appeal to the National Appellate Authority.

The provision therefore creates a specific national-level appellate mechanism for advance ruling disputes.

It is not a general appeal provision applicable to every GST order.

The essential elements are:

• there must be conflicting advance rulings;
• the rulings must relate to a question covered by Section 97(2);
• the rulings must have been given by Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories;
• an eligible applicant or authorised officer must be aggrieved by the ruling; and
• the appeal must be filed within the prescribed limitation period, subject to the statutory extension provisions.

Why Was Section 101B Introduced?

GST is a destination-based tax administered through the Central and State/Union territory tax authorities.

A business operating in multiple States can sometimes face the same GST question in different jurisdictions. The advance ruling system provides taxpayers with an opportunity to obtain clarity on specified GST questions, but State-level advance rulings can create a problem if different Appellate Authorities reach different conclusions on the same question.

For example, imagine a company has GST registrations in Delhi and Maharashtra and carries out substantially the same transaction in both States.

Suppose:

• the Delhi Appellate Authority gives one interpretation of the GST treatment; and
• the Maharashtra Appellate Authority gives a different interpretation of the same question.

The taxpayer could then face uncertainty regarding the correct treatment of the transaction.

The GST Council specifically proposed a centralised appellate mechanism to deal with such conflicting decisions of two or more State Appellate Authorities on the same issue.

Section 101B is the provision that establishes the appeal route for that situation.

Relationship Between Section 101A and Section 101B

Sections 101A and 101B should be read together.

Section 101A

Section 101A deals with the constitution of the National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Section 101B

Section 101B deals with the appeal to that national-level authority.

Section 101C

Section 101C deals with the order passed by the National Appellate Authority.

Therefore, the basic structure is:

Section 101A → National Appellate Authority

Section 101B → Appeal to National Appellate Authority

Section 101C → Order of National Appellate Authority

This three-section framework was introduced to create a mechanism for resolving conflicting State-level advance rulings.

Section 101B(1) – When Can an Appeal Be Filed?

Section 101B(1) is the main substantive provision.

It applies where, in respect of questions referred to in Section 97(2), conflicting advance rulings have been given by the Appellate Authorities of:

• two or more States;
• two or more Union territories; or
• States and Union territories.

The conflicting rulings must have been given under Section 101(1) or Section 101(3).

An eligible applicant or an officer authorised by the Commissioner may then prefer an appeal to the National Appellate Authority.

Who Can File the Appeal?

Section 101B identifies two categories of potential appellants:

1. An applicant who is a distinct person referred to in Section 25, and
2. An officer authorised by the Commissioner.

The applicant must be aggrieved by the relevant advance ruling.

The officer must also satisfy the statutory requirement concerning the State or Union territory from which the conflicting ruling arises.

What Is a “Distinct Person” Under Section 101B?

The expression “distinct person” is important because GST registration is State/UT specific.

Under Section 25, registrations obtained by the same legal entity in different States or Union territories are treated as registrations of distinct persons for GST purposes.

For example, suppose ABC Ltd. has GST registrations in:

• Delhi;
• Maharashtra;
• Karnataka; and
• Gujarat.

For GST purposes, these registrations are treated as distinct persons in the circumstances specified by Section 25.

Therefore, an applicant seeking to use the Section 101B mechanism must fall within the statutory requirement of being an applicant who is a distinct person referred to in Section 25.

What Does “Conflicting Advance Rulings” Mean?

The expression is central to Section 101B.

The provision is not intended to provide another appeal merely because a taxpayer disagrees with a single advance ruling.

There must be conflicting advance rulings from the Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories.

For example:

Ruling A

The Appellate Authority of State X concludes that a particular transaction is taxable at a particular rate.

Ruling B

The Appellate Authority of State Y concludes that the same question should receive a different GST treatment.

If both rulings concern a question falling within Section 97(2), the conflict may bring the matter within Section 101B.

The GST Council’s original proposal specifically described the national authority as a mechanism for dealing with conflicting decisions by two or more State Appellate Authorities on the same issue.

Questions Must Fall Under Section 97(2)

Section 101B does not apply to every possible GST dispute.

The conflicting rulings must concern questions referred to in Section 97(2).

Section 97(2) covers questions such as:

• classification of goods or services;
• applicability of a notification issued under the CGST Act;
• determination of time and value of supply;
• admissibility of input tax credit;
• liability to pay tax;
• whether the applicant is required to be registered; and
• whether a particular activity undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services.

Therefore, before considering an appeal under Section 101B, the underlying question must first be examined against Section 97(2).

Section 101B and State-Level Advance Ruling

To understand Section 101B properly, it is useful to follow the normal advance ruling process.

Step 1 – Application for Advance Ruling

An eligible applicant applies for an advance ruling under Section 97.

Step 2 – Authority for Advance Ruling

The Authority for Advance Ruling examines the application and gives its ruling under Section 98.

Step 3 – Appeal

An aggrieved applicant or eligible officer may appeal against the ruling to the Appellate Authority under Section 100.

Step 4 – Appellate Authority

The Appellate Authority passes its order under Section 101.

Step 5 – Conflict Between States

If Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories issue conflicting rulings on the same qualifying question, Section 101B may become relevant.

Step 6 – National-Level Appeal

An eligible applicant or authorised officer may file an appeal under Section 101B.

This makes Section 101B a specialised part of the advance ruling appellate structure rather than a general GST appeal route.

Section 101B(2) – Time Limit for Filing Appeal

Section 101B(2) specifies the limitation period for filing an appeal.

The ordinary period is 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated to:

• the applicant;
• the concerned officers; and
• the jurisdictional officers.

However, the provision contains a separate period for an officer authorised by the Commissioner.

Appeal by Applicant

An eligible applicant generally has 30 days from the relevant communication of the ruling.

Appeal by Authorised Officer

An officer authorised by the Commissioner may file the appeal within 90 days from the date on which the ruling is communicated to the concerned officer or jurisdictional officer.

Thus, the law provides a longer statutory period to the authorised officer than to the applicant.

Extension of Time by the National Appellate Authority

Section 101B also provides a limited power to condone delay.

If the National Appellate Authority is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within:

• the original 30-day period applicable to the applicant; or
• the original 90-day period applicable to the authorised officer,

it may allow the appeal to be presented within a further period not exceeding 30 days.

This means that the extension is not unlimited.

For an applicant, the statutory structure can therefore amount to:

30 days + maximum further 30 days

For an authorised officer:

90 days + maximum further 30 days

The additional period is not automatic. The National Appellate Authority must be satisfied that sufficient cause prevented timely filing.

👉 Read More → Section 100 – Appeal to Appellate Authority

Explanation to Section 101B(2)

The Explanation to Section 101B(2) is particularly important where there are multiple conflicting rulings.

It clarifies that the relevant 30-day or 90-day period is counted from the date of communication of the last of the conflicting rulings sought to be appealed against.

This prevents the limitation period from being calculated from an earlier ruling when another conflicting ruling relevant to the national-level appeal is communicated later.

Example

Suppose:

• Ruling from State A is communicated on 1 June.
• Conflicting ruling from State B is communicated on 15 June.

The statutory explanation makes the relevant starting point the communication of the last conflicting ruling, i.e. 15 June.

The purpose is to ensure that the appellant has the prescribed period after the complete set of conflicting rulings relevant to the appeal has been communicated.

Section 101B(3) – Form, Fee and Verification

Section 101B(3) provides that every appeal under the section must:

• be filed in the prescribed form;
• be accompanied by the prescribed fee; and
• be verified in the prescribed manner.

Therefore, simply sending a written representation or disagreement with an advance ruling does not constitute a valid Section 101B appeal.

The prescribed procedural requirements must be followed.

Why Is Verification Important?

Verification forms part of the statutory filing requirements.

It provides a formal declaration concerning the correctness and authenticity of the information and grounds submitted in the appeal.

Therefore, taxpayers should ensure that:

• the correct ruling is identified;
• copies of relevant rulings are available;
• the appellant’s eligibility is established;
• the conflicting nature of the rulings is clearly explained;
• the question is linked to Section 97(2);
• the appeal is filed within the applicable limitation period;
• the prescribed fee is paid; and
• the appeal is properly verified.

Example of Section 101B

Consider a company named ABC Ltd.

ABC Ltd. has GST registrations in Delhi and Maharashtra.

The company obtains advance rulings concerning the same question relating to the GST treatment of a particular service.

The matter goes before the respective Appellate Authorities.

Suppose:

• Delhi AAAR concludes that the transaction is taxable in a particular manner; and
• Maharashtra AAAR reaches a conflicting conclusion on the same Section 97(2) question.

ABC Ltd., being a distinct person referred to in Section 25, may potentially invoke Section 101B if the statutory conditions are satisfied.

The appeal would need to be filed within the applicable limitation period calculated in accordance with Section 101B(2).

The explanation becomes particularly important because the limitation period is counted from communication of the last conflicting ruling.

Example of an Officer Filing an Appeal

Suppose Appellate Authorities in two States issue conflicting rulings on the same qualifying question.

The Commissioner authorises an officer to file an appeal.

In this situation, Section 101B permits the authorised officer to file the appeal within the statutory 90-day period applicable to such officer.

The officer must nevertheless comply with the other requirements of Section 101B, including the prescribed form, fee and verification.

The officer must also be from the State or States in which the relevant advance rulings have been given, as specified by the proviso to Section 101B(1).

Who Can Be an Authorised Officer?

Section 101B does not permit any GST officer to file an appeal merely because the officer disagrees with a ruling.

The provision specifically refers to an officer authorised by the Commissioner.

In addition, the proviso requires that the officer be from the State or States in which the relevant advance rulings have been given.

Therefore, the statutory authorisation and jurisdictional connection are important.

Section 101B Does Not Apply to Every Difference Between Two Rulings

A taxpayer should not assume that every difference between two advance rulings automatically creates a Section 101B appeal.

The statutory requirements need to be examined together.

There must be:

1. a question covered by Section 97(2);
2. advance rulings;
3. conflicting rulings;
4. rulings by Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories;
5. an eligible applicant or authorised officer; and
6. compliance with the prescribed filing requirements and limitation period.

The actual facts and questions addressed by the rulings therefore matter significantly.

Difference Between Section 100 and Section 101B

Section 100 and Section 101B both concern appeals relating to advance rulings, but they operate at different stages.

Basis	Section 100	Section 101B
Main purpose	Appeal against an advance ruling	Appeal concerning conflicting advance rulings
Authority	Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling	National Appellate Authority framework
Nature	State/UT-level appeal	National-level mechanism
Key trigger	Aggrieved by ruling under Section 98(4)	Conflicting rulings by Appellate Authorities
Limitation	Generally 30 days, with further 30 days possible for sufficient cause	30 days for applicant; 90 days for authorised officer, with further period up to 30 days for sufficient cause
Relevant underlying questions	Section 97(2)	Section 97(2)
Connected order provision	Section 101	Section 101C

Difference Between Section 101 and Section 101B

The distinction is also important.

Section 101 deals with orders of the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Section 101B provides the national-level appeal mechanism where conflicting advance rulings exist.

Therefore:

Section 101 = State/UT Appellate Authority order

Section 101B = Appeal to national-level authority in cases covered by the section

Difference Between Section 101B and Section 107

Section 107 is the general GST provision dealing with appeals to the Appellate Authority against specified adjudication orders.

Section 101B is different.

Section 101B specifically belongs to the advance ruling chapter and concerns conflicting advance rulings.

It should therefore not be used as an alternative to the ordinary GST appellate mechanism for:

• tax demand orders;
• assessment orders;
• penalty orders;
• refund orders; or
• other adjudication orders,

unless the specific statutory framework makes Section 101B applicable.

Section 101B and the 2026 Interim Arrangement

The original Section 101B was designed to operate with the National Appellate Authority constituted under Section 101A.

A later legislative development is important for understanding the current mechanism.

Finance Act, 2026 inserted Section 101A(1A) to provide an interim arrangement until the National Appellate Authority contemplated under Section 101A(1) is constituted.

Under this mechanism, the Government may, on the recommendation of the GST Council and by notification, empower an existing authority to hear appeals under Section 101B. The explanation to Section 101A(1A) includes a Tribunal within the meaning of an existing authority.

The current arrangement therefore needs to be read together with Section 101A(1A), rather than assuming that the separately constituted National Appellate Authority described in the original Section 101A provisions is already functioning in that original form.

The statutory Section 101B appeal mechanism itself remains the relevant provision governing these national-level advance ruling appeals.

Role of GSTAT Under the Current Framework

The 2026 framework is particularly relevant because an existing Tribunal can be empowered to hear Section 101B appeals while the separate National Appellate Authority is not constituted.

Accordingly, when dealing with a current Section 101B matter, taxpayers should verify the latest notification and procedural requirements applicable to the authority empowered to hear the appeal.

This is important because the statutory provision and the institutional mechanism should not be treated as two completely separate matters.

Section 101B and Section 101C

After an appeal is properly filed under Section 101B, Section 101C becomes relevant.

Section 101C provides that the National Appellate Authority may, after giving the specified parties and officers an opportunity of being heard, pass an order confirming or modifying the rulings appealed against.

Where the members differ on a point, the matter is decided according to the majority opinion.

Section 101C also provides that the order should, as far as possible, be passed within 90 days from the date of filing the appeal under Section 101B.

Thus, Section 101B deals primarily with who may appeal, when an appeal can be filed and how it is filed, while Section 101C deals with what happens after the appeal reaches the national-level authority.

Section 101B and Section 103

Section 103 deals with the applicability and binding effect of advance rulings.

The National Appellate Authority framework was designed to give its rulings a broader effect than an ordinary State-level advance ruling in specified circumstances.

The GST Council’s proposal specifically contemplated that a ruling pronounced by the National Appellate Authority would bind applicants who are distinct persons and registered persons having the same PAN, subject to the statutory provisions.

This is one reason why Section 101B can be particularly significant for businesses with multiple GST registrations.

Section 101B and Section 102

Section 102 provides for rectification of an advance ruling where there is an error apparent on the face of the record.

The provision was amended to include orders of the National Appellate Authority.

Therefore, Section 101B should also be read with Section 102 when considering the legal consequences of a national-level advance ruling order.

Practical Checklist for Filing an Appeal Under Section 101B

A taxpayer considering an appeal under Section 101B should examine the following:

1. Identify the advance rulings

Obtain copies of all relevant rulings that are said to be conflicting.

2. Compare the questions

Determine whether the rulings actually concern the same or sufficiently identical question.

3. Check Section 97(2)

Confirm that the question falls within one of the categories specified in Section 97(2).

4. Verify the authorities

Confirm that the conflicting rulings were issued by Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories.

5. Confirm applicant eligibility

If the appeal is being filed by an applicant, verify that the applicant satisfies the statutory requirement of being a distinct person referred to in Section 25.

6. Check officer authorisation

If the appeal is being filed by an officer, verify the Commissioner’s authorisation and the State/UT requirement under Section 101B.

7. Calculate limitation

For an applicant, consider the 30-day period.

For an authorised officer, consider the 90-day period.

Also identify the date on which the last conflicting ruling was communicated.

8. Consider condonation

If the normal limitation period has expired, determine whether sufficient cause exists for seeking the additional period of up to 30 days allowed under Section 101B.

9. Prepare the prescribed appeal

Use the applicable prescribed form and comply with fee and verification requirements.

👉 Read More → Section 101C – Order of National Appellate Authority

10. Preserve supporting documents

Maintain copies of:

• AAR rulings;
• AAAR rulings;
• relevant applications;
• correspondence;
• communication dates;
• GST registration details;
• relevant contracts and invoices; and
• other documents necessary to establish that the rulings are genuinely conflicting.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Treating Section 101B as a normal GST appeal

Section 101B is a specialised advance ruling provision.

Ignoring the conflicting-ruling requirement

Disagreement with one AAAR ruling by itself does not automatically create a Section 101B appeal.

Missing the limitation period

The 30-day and 90-day periods should be calculated carefully.

Starting limitation from the wrong ruling

The Explanation to Section 101B(2) specifically deals with the communication of the last of the conflicting rulings.

Filing without checking Section 97(2)

The underlying question must fall within the statutory categories of Section 97(2).

Ignoring the prescribed procedure

The appeal must comply with the prescribed form, fee and verification requirements.

Key Takeaways of Section 101B

Section 101B can be summarised as follows:

1. Section 101B deals with appeals to the National Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.
2. It applies where conflicting advance rulings are issued by Appellate Authorities of two or more States or Union territories.
3. The conflicting rulings must relate to questions specified under Section 97(2).
4. An eligible applicant who is a distinct person under Section 25 may file an appeal.
5. An officer authorised by the Commissioner may also file an appeal.
6. The officer must be from the State or States in which the relevant advance rulings have been given.
7. An applicant generally has 30 days to file the appeal.
8. An authorised officer has 90 days to file the appeal.
9. The National Appellate Authority may allow a further period of up to 30 days where sufficient cause prevented timely filing.
10. The limitation period is calculated from communication of the last conflicting ruling.
11. The appeal must be filed in the prescribed form.
12. The prescribed fee must accompany the appeal.
13. The appeal must be verified in the prescribed manner.
14. Section 101B is different from the general GST appeal mechanism under Section 107.
15. Section 101B should be read with Sections 101A and 101C.
16. The 2026 interim framework under Section 101A(1A) is relevant to the authority currently empowered to hear Section 101B appeals.

Conclusion

Section 101B of the CGST Act provides a specialised appellate mechanism for situations where Appellate Authorities for Advance Ruling of two or more States or Union territories issue conflicting rulings on a question covered by Section 97(2).

The provision identifies who can approach the national-level authority, prescribes different limitation periods for applicants and authorised officers, permits a limited additional period where sufficient cause is established, and requires the appeal to follow the prescribed form, fee and verification requirements.

For an applicant, the normal limitation period is 30 days. An officer authorised by the Commissioner has 90 days. In either case, the National Appellate Authority can allow a further period of up to 30 days where sufficient cause is established. Importantly, the Explanation to Section 101B(2) clarifies that the limitation period is calculated from communication of the last of the conflicting rulings involved in the appeal.

Section 101B is therefore not a general GST appeal provision. It is specifically designed for the advance ruling framework and should be understood together with Sections 101A and 101C. Its broader objective is to provide a mechanism for addressing conflicting State-level interpretations of the same GST question and thereby bring greater consistency to the advance ruling system. The GST Council’s original proposal expressly identified conflicting decisions of two or more State Appellate Authorities as the problem the national mechanism was intended to address.

Why Choose Sarkari Bakery?

🏛️

Official Information

Government schemes & banking information based on official sources.

📄

Step-by-Step Guides

Simple application process explained for every service.

🔄

Regular Updates

Content updated whenever official rules or services change.

🛡️

People-First Content

Helpful, transparent and user-focused content.

★★★★★

4.9/5

Trusted by thousands of users for Government, Banking & CSC information.

⭐ View Google Reviews